So, Parkinson's prize is awarded to the Government of the Netherlands, Finland awarded an honorary diploma. There is no doubt that the true winners are named as part of the testing. Yet, by publishing these results, the author has to make three serious reservations. Firstly, the conditions for comparison not ideal. Undertook the statistical data available in a more or less similar form, so the author and chose them. The effectiveness of the state apparatus can be assessed and on the other, but this requires a serious artist and trained scientists, who will have a lot of time. There is no escape from the problem definition. What is a police officer with a statistical point of view that such a patient who is treated by a psychiatrist? In one country, police say, and prison guards, and the other crazy declared all, who has ever complained about the headache. So to spend absolutely accurate comparison, you need a deep and thorough analysis, it will take more than a year of work. So far, we are relying on science, we can say one thing: to evaluate the effectiveness of government in one way or another country can be. Moreover, the example of countries, where the effectiveness of the above, could usefully be studied others. Our statesmen beat their breasts - say, democratic governance more effective than (for example) the dictatorship. Would not you like to provide proof? Believe in the word somehow did not feel like it. It is necessary to design, develop and improve a reasonable basis for comparison, the well-known and recognized worldwide. The costs of their generalizations only a few months, the author takes to prove one thing: to create a comparative system possible - that he recommends.
English Medieval Industries: Craftsmen, Techniques, Products
Find and Download book
- Try another server.
- Try to reload page — press F5 on keyboard.
- Clear browser cache.
- Clear browser cookies.
- Try other browser.
- If you still getting an error — please contact us and we will fix this error ASAP.